TWHIP-UM AND SHIP-UM JAN MICKELSON

Twiggles4u ‏@twiggles4u

#TWhipumandshipumJan

Right-Wing Radio Talk Show Host Dan Michelson sharing his despicable and racist idea to grant "ownership" of illegal immigrants of Iowa, to the state.  

 

Conservative Talk Show Host Dan Michelson (ironically on WHO the fuck are you radio) said and believes one of the most despicable things I have heard on right wing radio (and that's a high bar there).   He wants to return America to the good ole days with "indentured servitude" by turning illegal immigrants into the "property" of the state of "Iowa."  

He was not done there.  Listen to the video on Young Turks where Cenk Yugar calls him out for the racist pig that he is.   It's a good thing he did, cause nobody else has, including the spineless democrats, but republicans not only didn't disavow him like they would have demanded immediately of the democrats and president, vice-president and everybody else they can throw in there, but some, like Scott Walker, have actually appeared on his show after the statements were made and did not say one word about it.

When a caller tried to call him out, saying the idea was clever (really) but it sounded like slavery to him, #TwhipumandshipumJan doubled down saying "what's wrong with slavery?" 

Holy shit! If you have no problem hearing those words come out of a mouthpiece screaming to hundreds, or thousands of people, then America is in big f'n trouble.  He explained, sure we will "feed and water" these "assets" with minimal amounts of nutrition, and have tent camps to hold entire families.

Heck, I bet your daughters would be the first auction this f'head would hold to sell off these "assets"!  Where the hell are America's leaders, where is FOX News calling for this guys head on a platter? Where are our politicians that used to stand for something besides "superpacs"? How can they all just ignore this kind of hateful, vile, language and let it go without incident  

It's still shocking to me that people are so hypnotized with their cell phones and electronic devices that they cannot even get enraged about topics that threaten not just America, but the entire world.  

A big shout out to TYT for reporting on this story!  Now if we could just get the truth out of you regarding "Fukushima" and the tragedy taking place in the Pacific Ocean, we might actually respect you again. The fact that your home is in California and yet, you continue to be quiet about the radioactive fall-out in our Pacific Ocean, when it should be the number one priority of all news agencies to warn Americans about swimming in the ocean and about eating the fish, is shocking.  This tragedy becomes deadlier every day from the "Nuclear fall-out" that has been pouring into the Pacific since March of 2011, and continues to release trillions of  PBq (petabecquerels, megacuries) of Plutonium, Stontium-90, Cesium-137, Tritium, and many others making the disaster now called "Chernobyl on steroids" by scientists like Helen Coldicott.  The truth used to be something you cared about, and what you used the platform you had to shine a light on.  Now the media blackout taking place includes you in it.  Come on TYT! Take the power back and live up to the "progressive news agency" you all claim to be. 

Why are Ron and Rand Paul Crazy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRnVSAqq9_s

Why is it that whenever Ron or Rand Paul say anything controversial, they are labeled nuts and not taken seriously? It's one thing to be a senator like Louie Gohmert, who is a nut and never says anything reasonable about policy or asparagus, but Rand makes an effort to answer questions for even far left journalists like Rachel Maddow, asnd he is the crazy one. What was crazy was thinking she would have an honest conversation with him, but she refused to be professional and acted like Paul's beliefs on the civil rights act were racist, he still came on her show knowing she had an agenda and would try to embarrass him, but when that didn't work, she harassed him because he had different views than her on the subject. She tried to label him a racist just like she did to Ron Pail when he ran for president, and neither one of their actions come anything close to the prejudice she used during both of the interviews.

She has a bias toward the libertarian strain of republicans that somehow they are all racists. That does not mean some of the republican tea partiers are not racist, we have all heard the disgusting people and racist comments Sarah Palin brought out in her followers during the McCain campaign, but the Paul's are the only two politicians willing to fight the blatant racism in our justice system. They both talk about ending the drug war and death penalty because of the obvious bias toward black men and women in this country, and no other politicians, whether they are democrats or republicans, have been willing to even bring it up. The real racists are people like Rush Limbaugh and Donald Sterling, but I don't see either of them marginalized or stepping up for her interview of loaded questions. 

It doesn't matter if you disagree with Paul or not, I have never agreed with any politician 100% of the time, but I can tell you the Paul's talk about more of the subjects I care about and think are the most honest of the whole lot of them, including Rachel Maddow.

Now, there is Sam Seder, who I really love to listen to, but even this show is talking down about Paul's comments about vaccines. Even though Paul has said he thinks vaccines are important, there is nothing unreasonable about not wanting forced vaccinations, even though my niece “was forced” to vaccinate her baby son with over 25 different shots within one week or threatened with the CPS taking her child away. They are the ones that are unreasonable. Some of the vaccines are known to have mercury, a well-known deadly poison, in them, but the ones pushing the vaccines are “not forced” to do any real research with studies long enough to know what damage or side effects could be caused by taking or mixing them with other shots, and because of that I find it irresponsible of parents who don't look into what doctors want to call necessary before letting them inject me or my child with anything. Just because there are not any studies to suggest it's true, does not mean it isn't. We have to look into why there are not any studies that look into any negative effects that could occur from mixing “live virus” cultures. Have they, Sedar or Maddow, just forgot about the aids infected vaccinations that Bayer knowingly shipped to the U.K. After being forced to remove it from the shelves of the U.S. Just to save their profits, as the FDC turned a blind eye. Not only that, how the hell did the vaccines get infected to begin with?

One last thing, just because the Paul's are not Democrats does not mean some far leftists, like me, do not want to hear from them without the snickers and synoscism, frankly I want a truthful conversation no matter what topic it is from all parties, and one thing the Paul's give is their honest opinions, not some “talking point”.  If you don't agree...move on to what you do agree with like:

"Getting rid of the “police state”"

“torture”, 

“floating prisons”, 

“the drug war”, 

the “Iraq war” or 

“perpetual wars”, 

all of which the Paul's will gladly discuss. I cannot think of any other politicians who I agree with more, Democrat or Republican! So, until you are willing to say all the above topics are not as important as your belief that the context of something they said “sounded crazy” to you, think about how crazy it really is that we are not having the discussions I mentioned above already, in any context.

Bloody September

Patrick Henry said: " We are apt to shut our eyes against the painful truth...Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not...? For my part whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth and to know it... now." " We are engaged in a struggle for liberty and truth right now, and the truth shall set you.......free.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Black smoke means the fire is running out of oxygen! Cool fire! About to go out! How do you go from cool to collapsed? Not only that! I bet these towers look a lot bigger than you thought they were huh?



That's because the government released this pix of the skyline instead.

This photo is very misleading as it does not show you just how large the twin towers actually are.

---

 

Compare it to this picture of the skyline.

This is the photo that should have been used to give people the correct perception on the twin towers enormous size.

---

There are lots of unresolved issues regarding September 11th. These issues will torment the few survivors and families everyday they remain unanswered. I stand by them all needing to be readdressed and answered with competence based on relevant information. They are haunting our democratic nation with there very existence. I am confident that if the people knew all of the conflicting evidence to the "Official 9/11 Report" they too would demand the answers to at least three.




My first question is "How did the twin towers collapse?"




We start with our government's claims: Two government agencies FEMA and NIST endorsed the "pancake theory", which is defined in short as the mass of the overhanging part of the building simply crushing the part underneath, accelerating as it falls. Think for a minute, picture in your mind what you might expect that to look like. The floors are pancaking down, with a gradual acceleration, they finally stop. What would you expect to see? How long would it have taken? What would it have sounded like?




Did it look anything like this?

The building is clearly shooting debris up and outward away from the buildings interior, it is not just caving in and burying everything on the inside by collapsing upon itself.

Testimonies from witnesses say that they heard, saw or felt multiple explosions.

Paramedic Daniel Rivera said "[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors" and then you hear it, bang bang, bang, bang, bang. (Riviera 1)

Another firefighter, one of the first to arrive on the scene said "when we entered the lobby it looked like someone had put a plane through it" . They were told a fireball traveled through the elevator shaft. (Cassaliggi 1)


A report was released offering seismic readings as evidence of gigantic explosions had taken place and melted molten steel at the base of the buildings is evidence of the presence of thermate which is used in demolitions . Many witnesses reported hearing explosions on ground level floors before the collapse of the towers. [Bollyn 1]

Hundreds of witnesses testimony was suppressed:  All of them that mentioned hearing or feeling explosions in the buildings.


After the ridiculous release of our governments official "9/11 Report", families were left with more questions than answers. NIST came out with a "pancake theory" as the reason for the building collapse. Many scholars, engineers and scientists easily debunked this unlikely event. In fact, the release of this report only infuriated new york residents, and now made the families of loved ones that knew it was not plausible more angry than ever before. The editors of Fire Engineering Magazine even called the release "a half baked farce."( fire engineering 1 ).

Scientists say there are only two ways to create this pyroclastic flow of smoke we see here. One is through volcanic activity and the other is with explosives.

---

  Engineers immediately point out that the government is denying the very existence of 45 massive beams that stood at the center of each trade center. They further note that even if the "pancake theory" were true the walls would have fell around the beams which would have still remained standing in such a collapse.

Even the Standards of Technology denied the "pancake theory" as the reason for the WTC collapsing.

The Scientific Proof that explosives and not fire was the cause of the towers collapse has been explored and proven by many respected sources.


Matthys Levy and Matio Salvadorei, two structural engineers, even conclude in their book, " When buildings fall down: How structures fail " that explosives were the only thing that could have caused complete structural failure for the twin towers and building 7, (shown below) that was never even hit by planes. This is one frame per second. The whole building fell in less than 6 seconds. It was half the size of the towers.

They are many examples of other fires that were larger, hotter, and much longer lasting than those at the twin towers and not one of them had caused complete structural failure.

One example was on Feb. 1 2005, The Windsor, in Madrid, Spain, burned uncontrollably for 18 hours, reached temperatures of 2,000º. The charred tower remained standing with structure in tact.

The goal of controlled demolition is to use explosives to bring down a structure into its own footprints without any air resistance. Keeping in mind that that is exactly how these structures came down, it should have at least been a hypothesis for the 9/11 Commission to recognize and evaluate .

How can our government still deny that explosives were used to bring these towers down when we all saw tower 7 collapse at free-fall speed with our own eyes and not even be hit by a plane?

We must ask "What did our government do, if anything, to stop it?"

Former LAPD officer, interviewed a NORAD official, and said that the official even gave him with written proof that "Vigilante Warrior" was in effect on the morning of Sept 11th 2001.


This is a "live fly exercise" involving terrorist's hi-jacking planes.

FAA was also doing at least 5 simulated training exercises that produced false radar blips on the screens, confusing our air traffic controllers.

This left us with only 3 fighter jets to protect the U.S. Skies



What did we do with those last 3 fighter jets? We sent them in the wrong direction so that by the time the Pentagon was hit they were still 300 miles away. (Further then when they took off). ( Klienberg 1)



The US also Issued 15 hi-jackers visas, based on incomplete forms.


Hi-Jackers were very unclear when asked what there destination was on these forms.


They had written simply "California" or "New York" with no school or university provided.( 2 )

One hi-jacker even put "no" in the destination box.( 2 )



Because we know that our government was aware of possible attacks against our country before September 11th, 2001, it surely seems to me they would have avoided causing any further confusions, made sure our skies were fully protected at all times, and kept a close watch for any terrorist possibly slipping in to our country. However, they didn't protect us, they even provided the opportunity for a successful attack with simulated exercises and drills that morning.


I know what you're thinking. You're asking if the government would possibly do this to us. So my last question is "Would the Government do this to us?"

We have to look at what happened in the days following 9/11 to answer that question.


Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Todd Whitman issued a statement in the EPA news release in 2001 proclaimed two days after the attack that "Disaster resources indicate that the water is safe to drink and the air is safe to breath" and "that there appears to be no significant levels of asbestos dust in the air in New York City". ( Stranahan 4 )

This is another look at the air quality in New York City that morning. The air was tested by a private agency two days after the false report by Whitman and was found to contain not only asbestos but radio active debris and mercury. You tell me is this air safe to breath?

The problem with this blatant lie makes it clear to me that our government was doing nothing to protect our citizens or their health.     ( 25 ).

The worst of all was that it was reported by ground zero workers that they were told not to wear respiratory gear as it might "scare the public".


This obviously resulted in many more now dying than was necessary from black lung decease, mercury on the brain and hundreds of respiratory problems.


If you have had the opportunity to see Fahrenheit 9/11 -The truth and lies about September 11th you would know that the government immediately passed the "Patriot Act".



This Act is an attack on our Bill of Rights as it slaughters at least 4 of the amendments in one fatal sweep.


Our Search and Seizure Amendment.



It states that the FBI or CIA can enter your house without a warrant and remove things from it that they can later use to convict you of a crime.

Our Freedom of Speech Amendment.



It states that they can also enter your business and seize records from it, and you cannot tell anyone they have been there.

Our 5th Amendment.



John Ashcroft announced he will be allowing wiretaps of terrorists talking with their attorney to be used against them. This attorney / client privilege is supposed to be protected under this amendment.

Our 6th Amendment.



William Saffire has said they may be holding military tribunals in the US.


These trials will NOT require revealing evidence against them , because it could be a threat to national security.

Will NOT need to be made public knowledge.

Gives the government the authority to execute the terrorist without ever having a trial.



Like I said slaughters our bill of rights all in one act that sounds like if you vote against it your being unpatriotic. The tribunals are removing the 6th amendment. No longer any Representation. All of this shames the democratic oaths they all made and swore to protect. Our Bill of Rights has been thrown out and replaced with a new world order, military rule, a shameful dictatorship. WAKE UP AMERICA! PLEASE WAKE UP! PLEEEEAAAASSEE!


If there was a doubt before, it certainly speaks loud and clear as to whose side they are on now. God help us! For the fear, I shudder, to think of the road ahead! Could the government do this to us? YYEEEEEEESSSSSSSS!


This information is from very reputable sources and are all included within the text, the statements are from policeman, firemen, engineers, scientists, scholars and demolition experts that know 3 things:


Fire did not cause these structures to fall!

Planes did not cause the collapse of the buildings!

Controlled demolition is the only explanation for the buildings complete structural failure.


After Larry Goldberg(owner of the WTC Buildings) told a reporter that controlled demolition was what brought down WTC building 7(never hit by planes). We should have immediately compared the buildings collapse with that of the twin towers. It is because we did not do that, and instead removed the steel from the site (usually a federal offense to remove evidence from a crime scene) that we should, as Americans, question the findings of the 9/11 commission.(9/11 revisited 1)

An uncontrollable fire caused Building 5 to burn everything with its walls.

All 7 WTC Buildings were damaged beyond repair on September 11th, 2001. DID ANYONE TELL YOU THAT?


I would like to include an additional Thank You to the following websites and to all websites dedicated to share the memories or knowledge regarding the 9/11 events :


http://www.citizenswatch.org



http://www.mujca.com



http://www.911truth.org



http://www.hugequestions.com



http://www.fromthewilderness.com



http://www.911revisited.com



http://www.reopen911.org



http://www.improbablecollapse.com



http://www.globalresearch.ca



http://www.inthesetimes.com


I would hope that high treason and conspiracy to commit murder in our country would lead to the future indictments, removal from office, convictions and incarceration of the people involved. Because as of today no one is being held accountable for any mistakes that were made. When they do find out the truth, I suggest them all be given sentences of no less than 3000 lifetimes.


[4] Burned To Core . "Blaze Ruins One of Madrid's First Towers." Academic Search Elite. ENR. Engineering News Record. 08919526. 2/21/2005. Vol. 254. Issue 7.





[2]Cassaliggi , Joseph. Firefighter. World Trade Center Task Force Interview. New York Times. Laurie A. Collins. January. 09. 2002.





[1]Bollyn, Christopher. American Free Press. http://americanfreepress.net . August 28, 2002.

[1] Riviera, David. Paramedic. World Trade Center Task Force Interview. New York Times. Laurie A. Collins. Oct. 10. 2001.





[6]Kleinberg , Mindy, Widow. Testimony to 9/11 Commission. March 31.2003. Video Recording. Joe Friendly.

[3]Levy , Matthy. and Salvadorei, Matio. "Why Buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fall." March 1, 1993. v118. n4. p45.

[5]Rupert , Michael. The Wilderness Publications, Center for Research on Globalization (CRG). Global research. California. November 11. 2001.

[7]Stranahan . Susan Q. American Journalism Review. InfoTrac. 9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used? Jan-Feb 2003. v25. p26 (8). (5021 words).

Other Resources

Dir. Dustin Mugford. 2006. DVD. .

Griffon, David R. Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories.

Steinbach, Robert. Avoiding hard questions on terror attack not the answer. (Questions about 9/11). The Miami Herald (via Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service). Feb 1, 2006. pNA. Opposing Viewpoints. Document CJ141537496.

Robert Kagan, ""The Benevolent Empire,"" Foreign Policy, Summer 1998: 24-35.

Key Websites: A special thank you goes out to:


911truth.org.

911revisited.com.

Reopen911.org.

Improbablecollapse.com.

Globalresearch.ca.

inthesetimes.com.

Mujca.com.

David R. Griffon.

And many more.


Thank you for opening my eyes to the truth so I could live my life awake.

Comments

You do not have permission to add comments.

California Strikes Down Death Penalty

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/07/californias-death-penalty-struck-down

Thank you California!  As a resident of the state, I am quite proud today to know that our judges are not giving in to  vigilantes who believe it doesn't do harm to society to execute criminals.  I firmly believe that this only creates a blood thirsty society that will seek to enforce vengeance, instead of trying to live peacefully side by side.

Stop letting the elite few dictate that we are supposed to spend our lives hating instead of loving one another.

The real shame with the death penalty is that it delivers lopsided justice that fails to treat everybody equally like it is supposed to.  That's why nobody rich is put to death, and they probably deserve it more than the ones we do put to death, because their crimes usually have many victims, not just one or two.

One more thing I will point out...to prove the need for vengeance...when they execute criminals...why do they have the families of the deceased at the execution?  It should be enough to know they are dead, you should not have needed to see the guilty suffer.  Only the family members that are relatives of the guilty should of been present, and the last face the guilty saw before they were killed.

It is a relief to know California will no longer be carrying out the agenda of spreading hate, for it is like a vampire, that sleeps in the darkness, digging deep below the surface and burying itself in the psyche of human nature, until society develops a taste for blood, and attacks all their closest neighbors, which retaliate and attack because they are now a blood thirsty society. 

The World in Black and White: What do Republicans talk about in secret meetings....destroying unions

The World in Black and White: What do Republicans talk about in secret meetings....destroying unions

What do Republicans talk about in secret meetings....destroying unions

On an episode of The Big Picture, "If it's Sunday, it's meet the Republicans", Tom Hartman interviews David Laskin, director of communications for the New York Republican party, and points out that President Ronald Reagan became the first of a series of presidents that decided to stop enforcing the immigration laws on the books and stopped sending white business owners to jail for employing illegal immigrants.

He makes his point even more valid by pointing out that before that happened the meat industry and carpenters unions used to pay their employees $30-$50 an hour until the businesses figured out they could hire illegals without consequence.

This is the real topics discussed in secret meetings like "The Caucus Room", the republicans have decided to take down all unions in this country and they know the way to do that is to have John Boehner hold off on passing any immigration bills, as the republicans really want illegals to keep coming in and destroying the democrats last real avenue of funding that does not extend to their party.  The unions destruction has been the real effort from the very beginning of Obama's presidency and you have to admit the house republicans may not be getting anything else done, but they are doing a very good job of destroying the unions in this country just the same.

Edward Snowden, Another Hero Whistleblower!

A new hero, Edward Snowden, has come forward knowing it would cost him his career, his friends and family, and even his country, but he decided to become a whistleblower on the NSA and the spying tactics they were abusing against our entire nation.

It's not just what they were doing, it's who they were (and still are) doing it to. And it's not just the access they were awarding themselves with being  wrong, it's about it being unconstitutional.  Not to mention unreasonable, especially with what they claim the reasons are for doing it.  Fighting terror.  Just how much terror would it stop by being able to read emails in the past, because we had communications ahead of 9/11 and that didn't seem to stop them, so my belief is none. 

His revelation that "The NSA has been gathering all internet data on everyone" should send shivers up and down your spine, but I realize we are full of spineless Americans, and representatives. 

People and representatives alike are saying shit like, "I don't mind NSA tapping my phones and reading my emails if it catches some terrorists, I am not doing anything wrong."  Then You Participate!  First of all, they are not tapping your phone calls, they are recording and storing everything , and using it as a database later to find whatever and whomever they want.  I'm not that naive to think that being innocent matters if you give a government (obviously a corrupted one) access to your life, they will almost definitely take it from you in one way or another.  We are all assets or were not.   

Let me just end with this...What happens when the government arrests you one day for a phone conversation you had 15 years ago with a guy who was associated with terrorism.  Don't think it will happen.  If they do not plan to use it for past crimes, what the fuck is the point?