Why is it that whenever Ron or Rand
Paul say anything controversial, they are labeled nuts and not taken
seriously? It's one thing to be a senator like Louie Gohmert, who is a
nut and never says anything reasonable about policy or asparagus, but
Rand makes an effort to answer questions for even far left
journalists like Rachel Maddow, asnd he is the crazy one. What was crazy was thinking she would have an honest conversation with him, but she refused to be professional and acted like Paul's beliefs on the civil rights act were racist, he still came on her
show knowing she had an agenda and would try to embarrass him, but
when that didn't work, she harassed him because he had different
views than her on the subject. She tried to label him a racist just
like she did to Ron Pail when he ran for president, and neither one
of their actions come anything close to the prejudice she used
during both of the interviews.
She has a bias toward the libertarian
strain of republicans that somehow they are all racists. That does
not mean some of the republican tea partiers are not racist, we have
all heard the disgusting people and racist comments Sarah Palin
brought out in her followers during the McCain campaign, but the
Paul's are the only two politicians willing to fight the blatant
racism in our justice system. They both talk about ending the drug
war and death penalty because of the obvious bias toward black men
and women in this country, and no other politicians, whether they are
democrats or republicans, have been willing to even bring it up. The
real racists are people like Rush Limbaugh and Donald Sterling, but I
don't see either of them marginalized or stepping up for her
interview of loaded questions.
It doesn't matter if you disagree with
Paul or not, I have never agreed with any politician 100% of the
time, but I can tell you the Paul's talk about more of the subjects I
care about and think are the most honest of the whole lot of them,
including Rachel Maddow.
Now, there is Sam Seder, who I really
love to listen to, but even this show is talking down about Paul's
comments about vaccines. Even though Paul has said he thinks vaccines
are important, there is nothing unreasonable about not wanting forced
vaccinations, even though my niece “was forced” to vaccinate her
baby son with over 25 different shots within one week or threatened
with the CPS taking her child away. They are the ones that are
unreasonable. Some of the vaccines are known to have mercury, a
well-known deadly poison, in them, but the ones pushing the vaccines
are “not forced” to do any real research with studies long enough
to know what damage or side effects could be caused by taking or
mixing them with other shots, and because of that I find it
irresponsible of parents who don't look into what doctors want to
call necessary before letting them inject me or my child with
anything. Just because there are not any studies to suggest it's
true, does not mean it isn't. We have to look into why there are not
any studies that look into any negative effects that could occur from
mixing “live virus” cultures. Have they, Sedar or Maddow, just
forgot about the aids infected vaccinations that Bayer knowingly
shipped to the U.K. After being forced to remove it from the shelves
of the U.S. Just to save their profits, as the FDC turned a blind
eye. Not only that, how the hell did the vaccines get infected to
begin with?
One last thing, just because the
Paul's are not Democrats does not mean some far leftists, like me, do
not want to hear from them without the snickers and synoscism,
frankly I want a truthful conversation no matter what topic it is
from all parties, and one thing the Paul's give is their honest
opinions, not some “talking point”. If you don't agree...move on
to what you do agree with like:
"Getting rid of the “police state”"
“torture”,
“floating prisons”,
“the drug war”,
the “Iraq
war” or
“perpetual wars”,
all of which the Paul's will gladly
discuss. I cannot think of any other politicians who I agree with
more, Democrat or Republican! So, until you are willing to say all the
above topics are not as important as your belief that the context of
something they said “sounded crazy” to you, think about how crazy
it really is that we are not having the discussions I mentioned above
already, in any context.
