A True Leader

A leader above all must be well respected and one way to achieve this respect, as a leader, is by taking a stance on controversial issues or by performing actions that provoke change. This change should be the grounds on which this leader stands at all costs. For the same grounds will hold the followers of said leader. The respect comes when the leader continues to hold the same significance or importance on the same issues without fear of losing followers. There we have the difference between political and military leaders.

The more respected of the two leaders is without a doubt the military leader. These leaders work very hard every day to become the leaders they are. They carry out orders from higher ranked leaders with supreme efficiency and order. Thereby creating better leaders from the training and hard work that are daily routines in their lives. Rank by rank increments increase their position of leadership and are by far the most respectable leaders in our world today.

Our political leaders are respected because of their ability to remain a leader without necessarily taking a stance or provoking change on any controversial issues. This is primarily because the political leader is trying to lead a much wider range of followers. They can not take a stance on issues as this would narrow the people following them, and in politics it is the people that elect you as their leader and so numbers matter.     

A Leftist View on Fear Policy

Our democracy has inaugurated pirates to repeat past mistakes we have already learned. The streets of New York have been used like its playground to blame for the evil when the tables are turned. The first phase of their powers took just a few hours, Bush sat in the schoolhouse while our towers burned. Then remained through the danger, as if nothing seemed stranger, to remain with the children after what he had learned.

In just a short while, and in a demolition style, our towers imploded and the story commenced.  We were told from Osama, but all through the drama, he remains free but we watched Hussein Lynched.

The lies have exploded, our policies corroded, each word that you speak is senseless and untrue. Your only true policy is fear of democracy, as you re-write what we stand for according to you. You are paying off media, outlets and reporters, to withhold anything that has its own view.  We ask for a reason, your acts become treason, stating we would agree, “If we knew what you knew”.

War crimes are committed, torture is now admitted, and the commanders now face a brand new challenge. With no Geneva convention, it has created new tension, to calm the blue soldiers who seek to avenge.  Your words leak like venom, through every addendum to policies by this administration.  Still nothing, to show for, this incredibly slow war, if the war in Iraq is a true demonstration.

 

They have made “free speech” a “no speech zone”. Habeas corpus, the cornerstone, “for Americas laws, is as good as you get”.  The right to know a reason they have chosen to arrest you, it is very American to have the great writ. Still this administration, without hesitation, removes habeas corpus somehow to fight terror.  Removing this right, should have put up a fight, from Americans who saw this incredible error. Some leftists reporters, say drugs from our borders, have links that tie our own Cheney and Bush, would explain two patrol men, locked up for their role in arresting a drug lord for drugs that they push.

 

They pay off the media outlets, reporters and think tanks. They fire district attorneys that do not share their views, they hand off the headlines to make all the deadlines and make all the papers for tomorrows news..  The views of the few become the facts of the many. Individual reporters fight the embedded view. Stories used to be filtered but never were censored; stories once primetime are now kept from you. There are Journalists with photos but no photojournalists. Stories have become neutered, fixed on words filled with fear. Some even implanted, like September 11, No interviews with anyone asking real questions here. 

 

Do not mention dead soldiers, death tolls, or coffins. No pictures of the war, or drills on 7/7, do not use the word invasion, instead call it occupied. Or how the same eerie drills ran on 9-eleven. Lose all our emails along with a smooth trillion. While sneaking a billion packed on crates on a ship.  Lie again about weapons of our own mass construction and then use the same chemicals on more than one trip.
 

Bush decides he is the decider and he de-sides how he is doing.  His mind is made-up, to the wrong choice again. His final decision is that he has not yet decided. Either you agree with these decisions or the terrorist win.  He accomplishes nothing but he has drained all our resources. In addition, spread out our Forces incredibly thin. We hear temporary involvement, and build permanent bases.  Announce mission accomplished, but increase troops again. No levels or benchmarks we know our results, and repeat the same mistakes until there is no end.  Our results? Low ended! Our resources? Gone! We have no real advantage and we have no more friends. 

 

Our future is bleak and tomorrow uncertain. But, you've certainly cashed the blank check we gave. How can we give what is readily taken.  You use men like toy soldiers until they lie in their grave.  I cannot fight for you. I will rise against you.  The policies you offer I do not choose to save.  Your wasting our money you say to buy oil, but when your questioned of progress have nothing to say. You bring death and disaster, and nothing but turmoil. I just hope we return you the favor someday.

If I Were President!

I have an abundance of awards and ribbons for almost every athletic activity. Running, Jumping, Sit-ups, and Pull-ups.

I have always been very political, but just never pursued the field because the people I would share my time with would end up being other politicians. However, in light of the situation at hand I feel this is a sacrifice easily adjusted and necessary to talk some humanity in to each and every one of them.

I am currently a returning Journalism Student at CSUN. I was born in Baltimore, MD and I am 40 years young. I do plan to write on many of the ethics of this new administration and do all I can to try and sway the minds of anyone still behind the ideas and behavior of this group, but not to the left or right, to the center of the common good of the nation.

I believe in the good people of America, and the greatness of our proud heroes. I know that we can overcome the damage of a corrupt administration through the deliverance of justice and the necessity of truth. There is always responsibility that comes with being an enormous power, but it is not to use brutal force to steal wealth and luxuries from a weaker nation. It is to set prime examples of greatness through humanity and good will. It is to represent yourself as leading the way in to a brighter future by holding the #1 position in education, healthcare and above all economic growth and prosperity.

It is to never fall to the levels of others and instead remain standing strong and tall, proud and free. These are not mere words to be used up like wet napkins they are words that America was built on. They are words that describe what we must be made of especially in times that show signs of an evil corruption that is feeding on the hopes and dreams of our future by keeping us fearful of it.

People, Good People, stay strong and fight hard to keep the freedoms we have fought so long to create. Fight against this bitter few. Turn off your television sets, and do what is right, do whatever you can, use your influence and beautiful minds to lead our troops home!

Is the United States a True Free Society?

In the next few paragraphs, I am going to discuss what freedom means to me. I will explain what ways I feel freedom is vital to the art of being human. In addition, whether freedom is an inherent right of humankind and how our societal institutions limit our personal freedom and how all this make total freedom impossibility, even in a free society.

The idea of freedom is a strong desire for any human being and one that is worth fighting, and even dying for. What is life if it cannot be experienced free? The problems with freedom always arise when we deal with the very real and easily corruptible side of humankind. Unfortunately, it is very easy for man to be corrupted by greed and power to which freedom quickly shrinks and bows in comparison. You see, as strong as the desire to be free is it is not even comparable when you look at the desire to be rich and powerful.

Our institutions were designed to keep some of those checks and balances in place, so that when any one member or members began to jeopardize a society's freedom by utilizing too much power or greed or took away another individuals freedom we could remove that entity from their position and in theory assure our members were out of harms way.

One way this system is flawed is that jurors are not paid very much money for their services. Employers wrongly are given a choice to pay them (should be mandatory) or not, so some people receive only $5.00 a day from our government for their services. This, I feel, harms our system as jury members may be more willing to stay and state their opinions longer if they did not feel forced by loss or no income of their own to come to swift and often hasty verdicts. Not only that, our institutions are also ran by corruptible men who see that filling their prisons makes their pockets thicker and it has come to the point now that any member who becomes a prisoner gets tangled in the politics of institutions for the rest of their lives even after they are released back into society.

However, after the 2006 passing of the military commissions act, almost all of our bill of rights was eliminated with the removal of Habeas Corpus. George W. Bush rushed this bill through so fast some members did not even read it before they signed it. It eliminates our right to ask why we are being imprisoned and hold us indefinitely without even showing us the evidence against us. Without that right, our first right, freedom of speech becomes mute, our second right to bear arms will be hard to do if we are imprisoned indefinitely, our fourth search and seizure becomes a mute point, trials? Forget it there goes the fifth, speedy trials, no! There goes 6th and 7th, 8th bails? Right Ninth? Other rights retained by the people, well as Keith Olbermann says about the 9th and 10th if you can name them while were water boarding you maybe we will consider it. In addition, powers not delegated by the US Government, he reminds us that is where they ended up anyway.

Bloody September: The Simulated War

Bloody September (The Simulated War)

Patrick Henry said: " We are apt to shut our eyes against the painful truth...Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not...? For my part whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth and to know it... now." " We are engaged in a struggle for liberty and truth right now, and the truth shall set you.......free.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



black smoke means the fire is running out of oxygen! Cool fire! About to go out! How do you go from cool to collapsed? Not only that! I bet these towers look a lot bigger than you thought they were huh?







Thats because the government released this pix of the skyline instead.

---

This photo is very misleading as it does not show you just how3 large the twin towers actually are

---

This is the photo that should have been used to give people the correct perception on the twin towers enormous size

There are lots of unresolved issues regarding September 11th. These issues will torment the few survivors and families everyday they remain unanswered. I stand by them all needing to be readdressed and answered with competance based on relevant information. They are haunting our democratic nation with there very existence. I am confident that if the people knew all of the conflicting evidence to the "Official 9/11 Report" they too would demand the answers to at least three.











My first question is "How did the twin towers collapse?"







We start with our government's claims: Two government agencies FEMA and NIST. endorsed the "pancake theory", which is defined in short as the mass of the overhanging part of the building simply crushing the part underneath, accelerating as it falls. Think for a minute, picture in your mind what you might expect that to look like. The floors are pancaking down, with a gradual acceleration, they finally stop. What would you expect to see? How long would it have taken? What would it have sounded like?











Did it look anything like this?

The building is clearly shooting debris up and outward away from the buildings interior, it is not just caving in upon itself and burying everything on the inside by collapsing upon itself.

Testimonies from witnesses say that they heard, saw or felt multiple explosions.







Paramedic Daniel Rivera said "[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors" and then you hear it, bang bang, bang, bang, bang. (Riviera 1)



Check out this schematic of what UNOFFICIALLY DID happen!









Another firefighter, one of the first to arrive on the scene said "when we entered the lobby it looked like someone had put a plane through it" . They were told a fireball traveled through the elevator shaft. (Cassaliggi 1)



This is a report on seismic evidence and melted molten steel from 9/11. Proving that there were explosions on ground level floors before the collapse of the towers. [Bollyn 1]









Hundreds of witnesses interviewed said that explosions were felt on various levels of the buildings before and during the buildings collapsing.





After the ridiculous release of our governments official "9/11 Report", families were left with more questions than answers. They came out with a "pancake theory" as the reason for the building collapse. Many Scholars, Engineers and Scientists easily debunked this unlikely event. In fact, the release of this report only infuriated new york residents, and now made the families of loved ones that knew it was not plausible more angry than ever before. The editors of Fire Engineering Magazine even called the release "a half baked farce."( fire engineering 1 ).

---

Scientists say there are only two ways to create this pyroclastic flow of smoke we see here. One is through volcanic activity and the other is with explosives.

Engineers immediately point out that the government is denying the very existence of 45 massive beams that stood at the center of each trade center. They further note that even if the "pancake theory" were true the walls would have fell around the beams which would have still remained standing in such a collapse.

Even the Standards of Technology denied the "pancake theory" as the reason for the WTC collapsing.





The Scientific Proof that explosives and not fire was the cause of the towers collapse has been explored and proven by many respected sources.







Matthys Levy and Matio Salvadorei, two structural engineers, even conclude in their book, " When buildings fall down: How structures fail " , that explosives were the only thing that could have caused complete structural failure for the twin towers and building 7, (shown below) that was never hit by planes. This is one frame per second. The whole building fell in less than 6 seconds. It was half the size of the towers.











They show us that squibs were present , which are puffs of smoke, these are a clear indication that pre positioned explosives were used to bring down the towers.

It is a fact that steel has a melting point of 2800º and that the kerosene from the aircraft, even FEMA admits, would have been burned off very quickly, and never got hotter than 500º.

They are many examples of other fires that were larger, hotter, and much longer lasting than those at the twin towers and not one of them had caused complete structural failure.

One example was on Feb. 1 2005, The Windsor, in Madrid, Spain, burned uncontrollably for 18 hours, reached temperatures of 2,000º. The charred tower remained standing with structure in tact.

The goal of controlled demolition is to use explosives to bring down a structure into its own footprints without any air resistance. Keeping in mind that that is exactly how these structures came down, it should have at least been a hypothesis for the 9/11 Commission to recognize and evaluate .

How can our government still deny that explosives were used to bring these towers down when we all saw tower 7 collapse at freefall speed with our own eyes and not even be hit by a plane?

We must ask "What did our government do, if anything, to stop it?"







Former LAPD officer, interviewed a NORAD official, and said that the official even gave him with written proof that "Vigilante Warrior" was in effect on the morning of Sept 11th 2001.







This is a "live fly exercise" involving terrorist's hi-jacking planes.





FAA was also doing at least 5 simulated training exercises







That produced false radar blips on the screens, confusing our air traffic controllers.

Left us with only 3 fighter jets to protect the U.S. Skies







What did we do with those last 3 fighter jets? We sent them in the wrong direction so that by the time the Pentagon was hit they were still 300 miles away. (Further then when they took off). ( Klienberg 1 )









The US also Issued 15 hi-jackers visas, based on incomplete forms.







Hi-Jackers were very unclear when asked what there destination was on these forms.







They had written simply "California" or "New York" with no school or university provided.( 2 )

One hi-jacker even put "no" in the destination box.( 2 )













Because we know that our government was aware of possible attacks against our country before September 11th, 2001, it surely seems to me they would have avoided causing any further confusions, made sure our skies were fully protected at all times, and kept a close watch for any terrorist possibly slipping in to our country. However, they didn't protect us, they even provided the opportunity for a successful attack with simulated exercises and drills that morning.









I know what you're thinking. You're asking if the government would possibly do this to us. So my last question is "Would the Government do this to us?"







We have to look at what happened in the days following 9/11 to answer that question.







Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Todd Whitman issued a statement in the EPA news release in 2001 proclaimed two days after the attack that "Disaster resources indicate that the water is safe to drink and the air is safe to breath" and "that there appears to be no significant levels of asbestos dust in the air in New York City". ( Stranahan 4 )

This is another look at the air quality in New York City that morning. The air was tested by a private agency two days after the false report by whitman and was found to contain not only asbestoes but radio active debris and mercury. You tell me is this air safe to breath?

The problem with this blatant lie makes it clear to me that our government was doing nothing to protect our citizens or thier health.( 25 ).

The worst of all was that it was reported by ground zero workers that they were told not to wear respiratory gear as it might "scare the public".







This obviously resulted in many more now dying than was necessary from black lung decease, mercury on the brain and hundreds of respiratory problems.









If you have had the opportunity to see Farhenheit 9/11 -The truth and lies about September 11th you would know that the government immediately passed the "Patriot Act".







This Act is an attack on our Bill of Rights as it slaughters at least 4 of the amendments in one fatal sweep.







Our Search and Seizure Amendment.



It states that the FBI or CIA can enter your house without a warrant and remove things from it that they can later use to convict you of a crime.

Our Freedom of Speech Amendment.



It states that they can also enter your business and seize records from it, and you cannot tell anyone they have been there.

Our 5th Amendment.



John Ashcroft announced he will be allowing wiretaps of terrorists talking with their attorney to be used against them. This attorney / client privalage is supposed to be protected under this amendment.

Our 6th Amendment.



William Saffire has said they may be holding military tribunals in the US.







These trials will NOT require revealing evidence against them , because it could be a threat to national security.

Will NOT need to be made public knowledge.

Gives the government the authority to execute the terrorist without ever having a trial.





















Like I said slaughters our bill of rights all in one act that sounds like if you vote against it your being unpatriotic. The tribunals are removing the 6th amendment. No longer any Representation. All of this shames the democratic oaths they all made and swore to protect. Our Bill of Rights has been thrown out and replaced with a new world order, military rule, a shameful dictatorship. WAKE UP AMERICA! PLEASE WAKE UP! PLEEEEAAAASSEE!









If there was a doubt before, it certainly speaks loud and clear as to whose side they are on now. God help us! For the fear, I shudder, to think of the road ahead! Could the government do this to us? YYEEEEEEESSSSSSSS!







This information is from very reputable sources and are all included within the text, the statements are from policeman, firemen, engineers, scientists, scholars and demolition experts that know 3 things:











Fire did not cause these structures to fall!

Planes did not cause the collapse of the buildings!

Controlled demolition is the only explanation for the buildings complete structural failure.







After Larry Goldberg(owner of the WTC Buildings) told a reporter that controlled demolition was what brought down WTC building 7(never hit by planes). We should have immediately compared the buildings collapse with that of the twin towers. It is because we did not do that, and instead removed the steel from the site (usually a federal offense to remove evidence from a crime scene) that we should, as Americans, question the findings of the 9/11 commission.(9/11 revisited 1)

An uncontrollable fire caused Building 5 to burn everything with its walls.

All 7 WTC Buildings were damaged beyond repair on September 11th, 2001. DID ANYONE TELL YOU THAT?





I would like to include an additional Thank You to the following websites and to all websites dedicated to share the memories or knowledge regarding the 9/11 events :







http://www.citizenswatch.org



http://www.mujca.com



http://www.911truth.org



http://www.hugequestions.com



http://www.fromthewilderness.com



http://www.911revisited.com



http://www.reopen911.org



http://www.improbablecollapse.com



http://www.globalresearch.ca



http://www.inthesetimes.com







I would hope that high treason and conspiracy to commit murder in our country would lead to the future indictments, removal from office, convictions and incarceration of the people involved. Because as of today no one is being held accountable for any mistakes that were made. When they do find out the truth, I suggest them all be given sentences of no less than 3000 lifetimes.











[4] Burned To Core . "Blaze Ruins One of Madrid's First Towers." Academic Search Elite. ENR. Engineering News Record. 08919526. 2/21/2005. Vol. 254. Issue 7.





[2]Cassaliggi , Joseph. Firefighter. World Trade Center Task Force Interview. New York Times. Laurie A. Collins. January. 09. 2002.





[1]Bollyn, Christopher. American Free Press. http://americanfreepress.net . August 28, 2002.

[1] Riviera, David. Paramedic. World Trade Center Task Force Interview. New York Times. Laurie A. Collins. Oct. 10. 2001.





[6]Kleinberg , Mindy, Widow. Testimony to 9/11 Commission. March 31.2003. Video Recording. Joe Friendly.

[3]Levy , Matthy. and Salvadorei, Matio. "Why Buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fall." March 1, 1993. v118. n4. p45.

[5]Rupert , Michael. The Wilderness Publications, Center for Research on Globalization (CRG). Global research. California. November 11. 2001.

[7]Stranahan . Susan Q. American Journalism Review. InfoTrac. 9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used? Jan-Feb 2003. v25. p26 (8). (5021 words).

Other Resources

Dir. Dustin Mugford. 2006. DVD. .

Griffon, David R. Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories.

Steinbach, Robert. Avoiding hard questions on terror attack not the answer. (Questions about 9/11). The Miami Herald (via Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service). Feb 1, 2006. pNA. Opposing Viewpoints. Document CJ141537496.

Robert Kagan, ""The Benevolent Empire,"" Foreign Policy, Summer 1998: 24-35.

Key Websites: A special thank you goes out to:







911truth.org.







911revisited.com.







Reopen911.org.







Improbablecollapse.com.







Globalresearch.ca.







inthesetimes.com.







Mujca.com.







David R. Griffon.







And many more.











Thank you for opening my eyes to the truth so I could live my life awake.

Conglomerate Media: No Room for in a Democracy

Specific purpose: To persuade my audience to use other sources for their news and information besides mainstream media.

---

Our new conglomerate media is limiting our news and sanitizing our wars and disasters

A video called Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land Learn what is really going on that the media is not telling us! is very enlightening and a must see for every patriotic american.

Meet Rupert Murdock! The owner and founder of Fox News.

You can see he inherited his first newspaper at a very young age and from there, there was no stopping him. He bought every type of media advertising available.

Outfoxed 1:17:43

Before 1999, there were regulations prohibiting owners from buying numerous radio, television stations, newspapers, and magazines: digest 301-311.

However, the 1999 telecommunications act that passed eliminated these vital regulations. Without these restrictions we are narrowing the newsroom views, and tying a nuce on the throats of our reporters so they can only speak in unison or when spoken to. This is the way today's media looks!

Only a handful of companies have power over the media and are controlling what the world sees and hears

There are many negative influences that big corporations have on our media.

One individual that benefited from this act was Murdock!

Here is what Murdock owns today.

His total audience reaches 4.7 billion people throughout the world. To put that in perspective that is ¾ of the population.

(Outfoxed)

These regulations were in place to keep the diversity within our news and information. Conglomerate owned media has too much advertising power over the people and an enormous influence on public opinion in our society.

For example: Think about how Johnny Cochran got OJ off the murder charges against him with a simple statement to the press "If it doesn’t fit, you must equit". Our media influences our decisions, like it or not. This means that the newsrooms that are tied to the opinionated Republican Rupert Murdock, like Fox News, are now not only conservative, but fully right wing only. It is a bias news channel and politically motivated to spread only thier own views and policies of the government’s propaganda.

Perhaps the worst example was demonstrated when George W. Bush’s Cousin, Marvin Bush, who was hired to crunch numbers for the election in 2000 when it was Bush/Kerry at Fox News, was the first to announce GW Bush the clear winner of Florida and new President of the US. The numbers he received that morning must have been different from the ones everyone else got, because they all were showing it was too close to call. The incredible result after the announcement is the part that still baffles me. Within minutes, all the other news channels followed suit and one by one they too announced GW President. It was this elucidation that held in the American people’s minds and had more to do with Bush becoming President than any recount, or flemsy ballot design ever did.

Although Fox News came out and publicly apologized for its terrible mistake, on some small channel and hidden network, very briefly. What good does that do anyway, it shouldn’t have ever happened to begin with.

What we need to do is cut their air time during the next election; let that be a statement of having a mistake like that happen in your newsroom.

Our government has been passing acts based on a war of lies. The Patriot act slaughters our bill of rights all in one fatal swoop. All of it is said to be for "terrorists" in our country. The US has ordered 450,000 new beds for our jails. Are there 450,000 terrorists in our country?

An ex-member of parliament had put this in perspective in the Video, "Murdocks War on Journalism", "you cannot have any witnesses when you have a war based on lies". This is why the US is marking territories as "no reporting zones." They even tried calling Fallujeh a "no reporting zone" but a few videos slipped through like the one titled "Fallujeh, the hidden massacre". (º Renucci 24:34 It contains an interview with two US ex military men. The first soldier, a sniper, was asked if he targeted civilians. He said "yes, on a daily basis". The other soldier admits his personal involvement in a project called "Phantom Fury" (very appropriate name) in Fallujeh saying that there were many times commanders issued warnings over radio communications before dropping "whisky Pete". This is a military slang for napalm, although now it is called MK77, the effects of it are the same. Here are the dramatic pictures of the people killed by MK77 by our US soldiers.

Here is an example of what napalm (now known as MK77) can and does do to a body. It burns from the inside out, leaving your clothes in tact burning the skin to a crisp.

New polls taken in Fallujeh have shown that more people believe in violence now against American troops since the administrations attack, proving that efforts to liberate the country have failed miserably and only strengthened the resistance. (Hanley 14) Of course, when your country is attacked with a blatant disregard for human life, it portrays that country as a rogue nation, and you can no longer trust that country from there forward. So no democratic country would ever do that unless they had strong evidence against that country for its wrongdoing, and based their decision to go to war on intellectual reason and knowledge that had strong support from other countries or at the very least strong support from the people. Right? The thing is: Even if September 11th was justification for this attack, which I do not feel satisfied with any of the findings of the 9/11 commission, it still would not be acceptable to use chemical weapons on innocent women and children.

These pictures of this war, graphic or not should be published if nothing else than for the future history books, so we can provide pictures with our documentation of world news. We need to see images, so we can remember vividly the pictures in our mind, so we can know the full scope of what has happened or is still happening now. Maybe so we do not forget the events of the past easily

Here we are spraying MK77 over the city of Fallujah. Something we swore we would never do again. Changing the name from Napalm to MK77 does not make it acceptable. It should have people of America outraged. What they do not know, they do not get outraged about. They must make an effort to inform themselves because the government will not do that for them

First, Americans need to use various sources for their news and information outside of mainstream media. The power of the people can change the effects that a conglomerate media has on society. BBC and other media have proved that by telling the truth they can withstand government pressure. (Hanley.) Unfortunately, now that regulations were lifted, it is highly unlikely we can change them back. What we can do is make other changes to counteract theirs.

First, we need to set new guidelines for our reporters, like by making a certain line of questioning mandatory. Then hold our networks responsible for news reports that do not follow the guidelines we set.

• Most effectively by imposing steep fines.

  
  

• If necessary pulling their air time

  
  

• Multiple offenses could even Ban them from ever reporting news completely under any name or network in the future.

  
  

Before that happens though more people need to participate in making a difference. Most people don’t even know that any group of citizens can go to any editor and demand things.

• This not only gets results immediately

  
  

• It allows the people to be able to share thier thoughts on issues

  
  

• Plus, it lets the media know we ARE watching and WE WELCOME AND DEMAND change.

  
  

Perhaps if the American people knew the truth about this war, they may just rethink of new ways to bring our soldiers home. They may not see it the same way as our President does. We may see the truth is we are the problem in Iraq, not the answer. All you have to do is make other people you know aware of things you know are happening throughout our media and administration and the people will take over from there. Even our government knows that with the power of the people…anything becomes possible. Word of mouth spreads easy as butter but sometimes gives mixed truth.

1. Direct people to websites that provide the same information every time they read it.

   
   

2. Send your friends links to the following websites:

   
   

   1. Moveon.org

      
      

   2. Censored News Stories

      
      

1. Have them watch the following videos:

   
   

   1. Griggs part 1

      
      

   2. Griggs part 2

      
      

   3. Fallujeh:The Hidden Massacre

      
      

   4. Outfoxed-Rupert Murdocks War on Journalism.

      
      

If we don’t demand answers now:

• We will see more patriot acts.

  
  

• More telecommunication acts.

  
  

• Hear even less accountability for mistakes.(if that's possible)

  
  

• We will only be saying "it is acceptable to tell us lies and it is just to go to war based on those lies."

  
  

• Worst of all, more of our soldiers will die along with innocent civilians in Iraq.

  
  

Bush's low poll numbers are our power. I will end with the words from a video entitled "new world order".( New World Order ) "They are the gatekeepers and sooner or later someone will have to stand up to them, but where all others have failed you will succeed, your weapon is your knowledge and awakening the sheeple. All the information is out there free online, but you must seek it." So what will you do?

1. Will you stand idly by and watch our democracy crumble to a newly born dictatorship? or

   
   

2. Will you fight and help drive the poll numbers down with rapid decline, until we replace the whole administration and get new competent leaders who put the American people before the golden gavel's of the industry's individualism?

   
   

3. Will you have the will to fight for your country?

   
   

4. Show our troops you really appreciate thier efforts by making an effort of your own, on your own, before this administration decides they own you!

   
   

---

Hanley, Delinda C. Al Jazera world forum takes a hard look at freedom of the press. (SpecialReport) .......... InfoTrac Washington Report on Middle East Affairs Oct 2004. v23. i8. p14. (2).

• Freeman, Steve. Censored News Stories. Distorted Election Coverage. "A Corrupted Election," .......... Josh Mitteldorf, In These Times, Feb. 15, 2005; "Jim Crow Returns to the Voting Booth, .......... Greg Palast and Rev. Jesse Jackson. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Jan. 26, 2005. .......... http://www.wanttoknow.info/060127newsstoriescensored

  
  

• Daraghmeh, Mohammed. Effects of the Conflict on the Palestinian Media. Palistine. Israel. .......... Journal of Politics. Economics & Culture. 2003. Vol. 10. Issue 2. p13. 4p. .......... (AN 10677890). PDF Full Text(533K).

  
  

• New World Order (Top Secret)(VCD)Pt.1 www.Infowars.com .......... 7:37. 77MB. MPEG Video. 1394Kbps. 2. .......... Rights Summary There are no rights or restrictions associated with this clip

  
  

• Niman, Michael I. CQResearcher. Yes, We Murder Journalists. Humanist. Mar/Apr2006.Vol. 66. .......... Issue 2. p7-9. 3p. (AN 19862037). PDF Full Text (1.5MB).

  
  

• Outfoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War On Journalism Robert Greenwald.1:17:43. MPEG Video. 2. .......... Moveon.org . Rights Summary There are no rights or restrictions associated with this clip.

  
  

• Renucci, Sigfriao and Torrealta, Maurizio. "Fallujeh, Phosphorus". .......... http://www.currentissues.tv/fallujah_phosphorus.wvx . .......... 24:34. Windows Media Video. 218Kbps. 2. .......... Rights Summary: There are no rights or restrictions associated with this clip.

  
  

• Congressional Digest. "Should Congress Pass the Free Flow of Information Act?" Dec2005. .......... Vol. 84 Issue 10, p301-311, 6p, 2bw. (AN 19550929) PDF Full Text (2.7MB).

  
  

• Trotochaud, Mary. And McDowell, Rick. "The Invasion of Fallujah," Peacework. .......... Dec. 2004-Jan. 2005. "Fallujah Refugees Tell of Life and Death in the Kill Zone," Dahr Jamail. .......... New Standard, "The War in Iraq: Civilian Casualties, Political Responsibilities," Richard Horton. .......... Lancet, Oct. 29, 2004. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. April 15, 2004.

  
  

• York, Byron. EBSCO. Taboo. National Review. 7/26/2004. Vol. 56 Issue 14, p17-18. 2p. .......... Article. http://web18.epnet.com/citation.asp? Other Works Cited and References Used Media Coverage Fails on Iraq: Fallujah and the Civilian Deathtoll part 1: Fallujah-War Crimes Go Unreported. Peacework. December 2004-January 2005. "The Invasion of Fallujah: A Study in the Subversion of Truth". Mary Trotochaud and Rick McDowell. World Socialist Web Site, November 17, 2004. "U.S. Media Applauds Destruction of Fallujah". David Walsh The NewStandard, December 3, 2004. "Fallujah Refugees Tell of Life and Death in the Kill Zone." Dahr Jamail